The proposed Stop Insider Trading Act, which cleared the House in July, faced a wall of opposition in the Senate on Wednesday. Democratic senators argued the measure was fundamentally flawed because it failed to mandate the divestment of existing stock holdings, leaving hundreds of millions of dollars in potential conflicts of interest untouched. Furthermore, the bill explicitly exempted the president and executive branch employees—a significant omission given that President Donald Trump has executed over 20,000 securities trades in 2025 alone, with an estimated value reaching into the billions.
Beyond the ethics concerns, the legislation included controversial provisions mandating national photo ID for voting and stricter requirements for mail-in ballots. Voting rights advocates warned these additions would disenfranchise millions of citizens. Craig Holman of Public Citizen labeled the entire package a ruse, noting that House Speaker Mike Johnson has consistently blocked more robust, bipartisan efforts to force divestment. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) echoed this sentiment, stating that while he supports a genuine ban, he refuses to back a fraudulent version tied to voter suppression. "Put a real ban on the floor if you’re serious," he challenged.

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!